ThinkMedTek

The field of medical device development is a critical area where precision and accuracy are paramount. It involves a rigorous process to ensure that the devices meet specific quality and safety standards before they can be used in healthcare settings. Two essential aspects of this process are verification and validation. In this article, we will explore the definitions, best practices, processes, and differences between verification and validation in medical device development.

What is Verification?¹

Verification is a systematic and methodical process that ensures design outputs meet the specified design inputs. It involves confirming that the processes and products adhere to predefined specifications and standards. Importantly, verification is not a one-time activity; it occurs throughout the design process to catch any issues early on, preventing costly and potentially dangerous problems in the final product.

Best Practices for Verification³

1. Confirmation by Examination with Evidence: Verification is conducted through careful examination and analysis of the design outputs. The evidence collected during this process helps identify any discrepancies or deviations from the design inputs.

2. Use Tests, Trials, Inspections, and Analysis: Employ various methods such as tests, trials, inspections, and analysis to verify the performance and functionality of the medical device.

3. The Foundation is Well-Defined Design Inputs: The success of the verification process relies on having clear and well-defined design inputs from the outset, which serve as benchmarks for comparison.

Verification Process²

1. Translate User Needs into Design Inputs: Begin by translating user needs and requirements into specific design inputs, forming the basis for the verification process.

2. Have Sign-off by Stakeholders: Obtain approval and sign-off from relevant stakeholders before commencing the design work.

3. Begin Design Work: Initiate the design process, and as it progresses, create design outputs that organically correspond to the design inputs.

4. Ensure Design Outputs Satisfy Design Inputs: Continuously verify that the design outputs align with the predefined design inputs.

5. Document the Evidence: Thoroughly document all verification activities and results, providing traceability and transparency throughout the process.

How to Verify¹

1. Identify Device Requirements: Understand and establish the precise requirements of the medical device to create the necessary design inputs.

2. Develop a Plan for Verification: Create a comprehensive plan outlining the verification activities and the corresponding objectives.

3. Review Design Documents: Scrutinize design documents, specifications, and other relevant materials to identify potential issues.

4. Conduct Inspections: Inspect the design at various stages to ensure compliance with requirements.

5. Perform Walkthroughs: Systematically walk through the design to identify any design flaws or discrepancies.

6. Perform Static Analysis: Employ static analysis techniques to identify defects or vulnerabilities in the code for the software involved in the device.

7. Evaluate the Design of the Device: Assess the overall design from various perspectives, such as functionality, safety, and user-friendliness.

8. Analyze the Device and Document the Data: Gather and analyze data from all verification activities and meticulously document the findings.

What is Validation?¹

Validation, on the other hand, checks that the medical device and its components fulfill their intended use and user requirements. It evaluates the finished device’s performance, ensuring that it works as intended and effectively addresses the intended medical needs.

Best Practices for Validation³

1. Examined with Evidence: Similar to verification, validation should be backed by concrete evidence and data to support the conclusions drawn.

2. Includes Initial Production Units: Validation should involve testing initial production units to ensure they meet the intended specifications.

3. Utilize Clinical Evaluations, Involving End Users: To ensure real-world effectiveness, validation often includes clinical evaluations with the participation of end-users.

4. Test the Device in All Intended Environments: Validate the device’s performance in various environments and scenarios to ensure its versatility and reliability.

Validation Process²

1. Can Begin When You Have Production Equivalent Parts: Validation typically commences when you have production-equivalent parts or prototypes that closely resemble the final product.

2. Confirms Product Meets Intended Use in the Intended Environment: Validate that the medical device meets its intended purpose in the specific environment for which it is designed.

3. Testing Includes Usability Testing, Clinical Trial, and Other Hands-on Trials: Perform various tests, including usability testing and clinical trials, to validate the device’s functionality and safety.

How to Validate¹

1. Identify Requirements for Validation: Understand and define the requirements that the medical device must fulfill during the validation process.

2. Develop a Plan for Validation: Create a detailed plan outlining the validation activities, objectives, and success criteria.

3. Conduct Functional Testing on the Device: Test the medical device’s functionality in controlled environments and scenarios.

4. Evaluate the Device in a Real-Life Operating Room: If applicable, evaluate the device’s performance in an actual operating room or clinical setting.

5. Analyze the Device and Document the Data: Analyze all validation data, draw conclusions, and document the results for future reference and compliance.

The Difference Between Verification and Validation¹

Purpose of the Step:

Verification primarily aims to confirm that the manufacturing processes create the correct product as per the predefined design inputs. On the other hand, validation focuses on proving that the device functions as originally intended and fulfills user requirements.

Timing in the Process:

Verification occurs throughout the development process, continually ensuring that design outputs match the design inputs. Validation, however, can only occur after the development stage is complete and you have a functional prototype or production-equivalent parts.

Methods of Evaluating:

Verification is typically evaluated through reviews, inspections, and bench testing. In contrast, validation is evaluated through real-world use of the device, including clinical trials and hands-on testing.

Output of the Step:

Verification produces review and inspection reports, while validation produces test and acceptance reports.

Responsibility of Execution:

Verification is completed by the development team responsible for creating the medical device. In contrast, validation is often carried out by independent testing groups or third-party experts.

Case Study: Development of a New Bandage that Dissolves Over Time (A Fictitious Tale of Verification and Validation)

In the quest to improve wound care and enhance patient comfort, a medical device company embarked on the development of a revolutionary new bandage that dissolves over time. This innovative product aimed to simplify wound dressing changes, reduce discomfort, and promote efficient wound healing. However, the success of the project hinged on thorough verification and validation to ensure its safety and efficacy.

During the verification phase, the development team meticulously tested the bandage on simulated skin to assess its adhesion and sticking properties. They also conducted experiments to verify that the bandage would dissolve as intended over a specified period as was defined. Additionally, the team carefully evaluated the bandage’s dimensions, comparing them against the design inputs to ensure accurate manufacturing.

Once the verification phase was successfully completed, the team moved on to the critical validation stage. Real-world performance was key, so the bandage underwent testing on actual users with wounds in controlled clinical settings. This hands-on approach allowed the team to observe the bandage’s behavior in practical scenarios and address any issues that arose during the trials. Moreover, comprehensive biocompatibility testing was performed to guarantee the bandage’s safety and compatibility with human skin.

Through diligent verification and validation, the medical device company was able to introduce the dissolving bandage to the market with confidence. Patients benefited from a more convenient and pain-free wound dressing experience, while healthcare providers embraced the innovative solution. This case study illustrates how meticulous verification and validation processes are fundamental to the successful development and launch of groundbreaking medical devices that improve patient care and outcomes.

Conclusion

Verification and validation are indispensable steps in medical device development to ensure the safety, efficacy, and functionality of the devices. While verification focuses on confirming that the design outputs meet design inputs, validation ensures that the finished device fulfills its intended purpose and user requirements. By following best practices and systematic processes for verification and validation, manufacturers can deliver reliable and high-quality medical devices that positively impact patient care and safety.

Sources

1. https://synectic.net/verification-vs-validation-of-medical-devices/
2. https://www.mindflowdesign.com/insights/medical-device-verification-validation-process/
3. https://www.greenlight.guru/blog/design-verification-and-design-validation

Image by fh_media from Pixabay

Article created with the help of ChatGPT